<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Political Sushi</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bphouse.com/politics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bphouse.com/politics</link>
	<description>The state of the political union</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 06:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Those were the good old days</title>
		<link>http://bphouse.com/politics/2009/01/19/those-were-the-good-old-days/</link>
		<comments>http://bphouse.com/politics/2009/01/19/those-were-the-good-old-days/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 05:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Lillpop</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bphouse.com/politics/?p=35</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Once upon a time, the California Legislature was only 35 days late on the budget. I remember those good old days, when the politicians thought it would be fun to take their time, playing games with the budget. It's not so funny now!.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_34" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://bphouse.com/politics/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/budgetsign.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-34" title="budgetsign" src="http://bphouse.com/politics/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/budgetsign-300x200.jpg" alt="Arnold's failed legislature sign" width="300" height="200" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Arnold&#39;s failed legislature sign</p></div></p>
<p>The good old days were here but they are gone forever now.</p>
<p>Once upon a time, the California Legislature was only 35 days late on the budget. I remember those good old days, when the politicians thought it would be fun to take their time, playing games with the budget. It&#8217;s not so funny now!.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bphouse.com/politics/2009/01/19/those-were-the-good-old-days/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US Troops Needed at Border With Mexico–NOW!</title>
		<link>http://bphouse.com/politics/2009/01/09/us-troops-needed-at-border-with-mexico%e2%80%93now/</link>
		<comments>http://bphouse.com/politics/2009/01/09/us-troops-needed-at-border-with-mexico%e2%80%93now/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 20:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Lillpop</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[illegal aliens]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[war on drugs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bphouse.com/politics/?p=31</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As Mexico’s “war on drugs” decays further and further into a violent civil war, the United States government is making plans to do what should have been done on the afternoon of September 11, 2001: Seal off the U.S.-Mexico border with military force.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/x/blogger/6287/3274/1600/791518/5787uncle-sam.jpg"><img style="margin: 0px 10px 10px 0px; float: left;" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/x/blogger/6287/3274/400/659798/5787uncle-sam.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">By John W. Lillpop</span></p>
<p>As Mexico’s “war on drugs” decays further and further into a violent civil  war, the United States government is making plans to do what should have been  done on the afternoon of September 11, 2001: Seal off the U.S.-Mexico border  with military force.</p>
<p>As reported in the El Paso Times (1), in part:</p>
<p>“EL PASO — If Mexico’s vicious drug war ever spills into El Paso, the United  States has several response plans, one of which calls for a military surge along  the U.S.-Mexico border, Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff said this  week.</p>
<p>“Chertoff has instructed the 22 federal agencies that fall under Homeland  Security to develop border-violence response plans because the drug war in  Mexico appears to be escalating, not ending. So far, more than 5,300 people have  been killed across Mexico as rival drug cartels continue to fight over drug  trafficking corridors.</p>
<p>“One drug corridor at the center of the violence is the Juárez “plaza,” where  more than 1,600 people were killed last year. In Mexico, “plaza” refers to a  drug cartel’s territory.</p>
<p>“We completed a contingency plan for border violence, so if we did get a  significant spillover, we have a surge<br />
– if I may use that word — capability  to bring in not only our own assets but even to work with” the Defense  Department, Chertoff told The New York Times.</p>
<p>“El Paso County Commissioner Dan Haggerty said the news that the U.S. has  various levels of contingency plans to deal with the violence should be  comforting to most El Pasoans.</p>
<p>“I think it is going to get worse in Mexico, and we as U.S. citizens need to  be assured that Homeland Security or someone is going to protect us,” he said.  “We must accept that we live in a city that has been labeled as a major  drug-smuggling corridor and a place for illegal immigration.</p>
<p>“With that type of illegal activity comes the possibility that our safety is  at risk.”</p>
<p>Although it is reassuring to know that contingency plans are in place, one  wonders why the government is waiting for violence to spill over before  acting?</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;"><br />
Why not send troops to the border now to  prevent any spill over and to stop additional third-world illegal aliens from  invading America?</span></p>
<p>(1)<br />
http://www.elpasotimes.com/news/ci_11411512</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bphouse.com/politics/2009/01/09/us-troops-needed-at-border-with-mexico%e2%80%93now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Will President Obama Age?</title>
		<link>http://bphouse.com/politics/2009/01/08/how-will-president-obama-age/</link>
		<comments>http://bphouse.com/politics/2009/01/08/how-will-president-obama-age/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 10:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Lillpop</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[obama age]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bphouse.com/politics/?p=28</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That photo of the five U.S. presidents, past and future, together at the White House this week reminded me of two profound truths about America and our chief executives.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="post-body"><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_ARKLgMMazUY/SWaY4PXNZbI/AAAAAAAAC3A/S9dEmlhi2yA/s1600-h/obama1-20-09.jpg"><img style="margin: 0px 10px 10px 0px; float: left; width: 103px; height: 131px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_ARKLgMMazUY/SWaY4PXNZbI/AAAAAAAAC3A/S9dEmlhi2yA/s320/obama1-20-09.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a><strong></strong></div>
<div class="post-body"><strong></strong></div>
<div class="post-body"><strong>Satire by John W. Lillpop</strong></div>
<div class="post-body"><strong></strong>That photo of the five U.S. presidents, past and future, together at the  White House this week reminded me of two profound truths about America and our  chief executives:</div>
<div class="post-body">
<p>1. When it comes to presidents, crime does indeed pay, and</p>
<p>2. Mother Nature is most unkind when it comes to the aging of presidents.</p>
<p>In particular, the two former Democrat presidents, Jimmy Carter and Bill  Clinton, seem to have grown the most wrinkles, gray hair, and bloat during their  turns in the White House.</p>
<p>Unrepentant socialism does that to people, to say nothing of non-sex sex with  an intern in that little hide away off the Oval Office!</p>
<p>On the Republican side, Bush 41 and 43 look more like brothers than the  father-son tandem that brought America two wars in Iraq, one in Afghanistan, the  Savings and Loan Crisis, two recessions, the worst economic downturn since the  great Depression, open borders, millions of undocumented illegal alien peasants,  and annual trillion dollar deficits that will outlive both.</p>
<p>Then we have the face of the future, Barack Hussein Obama who looks too young  to be president, a fact that can neither be confirmed nor denied with any  certainty because the rascal has thus far refused to turn over his birth  certificate and has managed to get away with it!</p>
<p>The looming question on the lips of botox professionals everywhere is how  will Barack Obama age while in office?</p>
<p>What p<a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_ARKLgMMazUY/SWaZKXoEJ1I/AAAAAAAAC3I/MHDLvGphUcc/s1600-h/obama+four+years+from+now.jpg"><img style="margin: 0px 10px 10px 0px; float: left; width: 130px; height: 86px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_ARKLgMMazUY/SWaZKXoEJ1I/AAAAAAAAC3I/MHDLvGphUcc/s320/obama+four+years+from+now.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a>rice will the rigors and demands of power exact from Obama’s youthful  good looks?</p>
<p>As of right now, Obama might be “carded” by overly cautious bartenders  (conservative) were he to slip out of the White House for a small libation  between really dull, stressful meetings.</p>
<p>But how will Obama look four years from now? My guess is that he  will be refused alcohol because he will look too old to drink!</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bphouse.com/politics/2009/01/08/how-will-president-obama-age/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Hires Omar Epps to Be White House Doc</title>
		<link>http://bphouse.com/politics/2009/01/06/obama-hires-omar-epps-to-be-white-house-doc/</link>
		<comments>http://bphouse.com/politics/2009/01/06/obama-hires-omar-epps-to-be-white-house-doc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 12:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Lillpop</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bphouse.com/politics/?p=25</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While the Internet was rocked by news that President-elect Barack Obama has chosen Dr. Sanjay Gupta, the neurosurgeon and correspondent for CNN and CBS, to be U.S. Surgeon General (1), an equally news worthy appointment slipped through the cracks and received virtually no reportage whatsoever.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ARKLgMMazUY/SWQL7YsPQAI/AAAAAAAAC2g/3W702nsZk6A/s1600-h/drepps.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; width: 91px; height: 124px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ARKLgMMazUY/SWQL7YsPQAI/AAAAAAAAC2g/3W702nsZk6A/s320/drepps.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">Satire by John W. Lillpop</span></p>
<p>While the Internet was rocked by news that President-elect Barack Obama has  chosen Dr. Sanjay Gupta, the neurosurgeon and correspondent for CNN and CBS, to  be U.S. Surgeon General (1), an equally news worthy appointment slipped through  the cracks and received virtually no reportage whatsoever.</p>
<p>Turns out that Omar Epps, otherwise known as Dr. Eric Foreman on the smash TV  series titled <span style="font-style: italic;">House</span>, has been offered  the position of White House physician.</p>
<p>Which means that Epps, Dr. Foreman that is, will be responsible for the  medical care and treatment of the Obama family, including the requisite annual  examiniation of the president and reporting results to the media and American  people.</p>
<p>Cynics, mostly snotty, racist Republicans, are already lining up to ask what  qualifications Epps brings to his new position.</p>
<p>Will the American people be able to sleep soundly knowing that a television  actor, rather than a licensed medical professional, will be prescribing  medications for the most powerful man on the planet?</p>
<p>Should we fret, if even just slightly, over the fact that that a TV doc will  be stabbing BO in the bum when he (TV doc) suspects that a flu bug or nasty boil  is causing all that executive wrath?</p>
<p>How will the Secret Service react when Epps says he has to sedate BO in order  to do a brain scan? Will VP Joe Biden be authorized to rush over to the Oval  Office and take command based on the diagnosis and treatment prescribed by a man  who would be more culturally comfortable with a gang knife than a surgeon’s  scalpel?</p>
<p>What of maladies and suspected maladies too delicate to discuss in great  detail on a family web site? Can a TV doc be trusted to keep ultra-sensitive  information concerning skeletons in BO’s closet private?</p>
<p>Again, the issue boils down to qualifications. Anyone who has watched <span style="font-style: italic;">House</span> knows that Epps is a capable actor and a  man of integrity, at least in his role as Dr. Foreman.</p>
<p>But what in the world makes Epps qualified to practice medicine out of the  White House?</p>
<p>Obama insiders defend the decision by pointing out that Leon Panetta is  without any credentials in intelligence, yet he has been picked to serve as  Director of the CIA.</p>
<p>Mediocrity based on precedent seems a damn poor way to staff the president’s  cabinet, but that is what America is up against with BO.</p>
<p>A “google” of Epps background may provide valuable insight: Turns out that  Epps starred in a 2002 flick, Love and Basketball, in addition to other acting  gigs while portraying a young black athlete.</p>
<p>Now it makes perfect sense: <span style="font-weight: bold;">Epps is perfect  because he is a brother who’s “got game,” and can do some one-on-one hoops with  BO in emergencies! </span></p>
<p>Reference (1)<br />
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2009/01</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bphouse.com/politics/2009/01/06/obama-hires-omar-epps-to-be-white-house-doc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Is Bernie Madoff Not In Jail?</title>
		<link>http://bphouse.com/politics/2009/01/05/why-is-bernie-madoff-not-in-jail/</link>
		<comments>http://bphouse.com/politics/2009/01/05/why-is-bernie-madoff-not-in-jail/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 20:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Lillpop</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[bernie madoff]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[white collar crime]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bphouse.com/politics/?p=21</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A cliché commonly used when discussing justice in America is,”You do the crime, you must do the time.”]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ARKLgMMazUY/SWLISb6lZEI/AAAAAAAAC2A/jvOXEAiQ4R8/s1600-h/madoff.jpg"><img style="margin: 0px 10px 10px 0px; float: left; width: 165px; height: 165px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ARKLgMMazUY/SWLISb6lZEI/AAAAAAAAC2A/jvOXEAiQ4R8/s400/madoff.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">By John W. Lillpop</span></p>
<p>A cliché commonly used when discussing justice in America is,”You do the  crime, you must do the time.”</p>
<p>Fair enough. However, why is that standard of justice nearly non-existent  when it comes to a despicable swindler like Bernie Madoff?</p>
<p>Madoff is the American businessman and former chairman of the NASDAQ stock  exchange who was arrested on December 11, 2008 and charged with engineering the  largest investor fraud ever committed by a single individual in world financial  history.</p>
<p>Madoff created an elaborate “Ponzi Scheme” in which he swindled well-schooled  bankers, Wall Street investors, charities, and individuals out of $50 billion  dollars.</p>
<p>That number $50 billion is hard for most people to comprehend. Think of it in  familiar terms: George W. Bush sent $17 billion of your money to bail out  automakers in December.</p>
<p>Bernie Madoff swindled three times that amount from professionals and others  that should have known better.</p>
<p>Despite the enormity of his crimes and the harm inflicted on countless  numbers of innocent people, Madoff is a free man, after posting a $10 million  bond.</p>
<p>While the U.S. Congress and prosecutors sort out the greatest hoax in  history, the mastermind of deceit continues to enjoy a life of luxury and  opulence made possible by that very hoax.</p>
<p>Madoff’s successful run of felonies has put enormous pressure on the  Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the government agency created in 1934  to regulate the stock market and prevent corporate abuses relating to the  offering and corporate reporting.</p>
<p>For a complete history of the SEC, refer to reference (1).</p>
<p>The burning question running through the halls of Congress and minds of  jilted investors is: Why did the SEC fail to catch this bottom-feeding crook?  How in the hell did one man manage to steal $50 billion from some of the most  sophisticated and tough-minded money people in the world in the heavy regulated  environment of financial investments?</p>
<p>Has Bernie Madoff ever been investigated by the SEC?</p>
<p>In fact, the SEC did investigate Madoff at least eight times since 1992 as  reported by the Associated Press, Reference 2.</p>
<p>From the linked reference this summary in part:</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">“The many fruitless probes into Bernie  Madoff</span>:<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;"><br />
Starting in 1992, federal  regulators on many occasions examined various aspects of Bernard Madoff’s  business operations, but they never turned up the alleged $50 billion Ponzi  scheme that led to Madoff’s arrest last month. The history of regulatory failure  in the Madoff scandal:</span><br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;"><br />
1992</span></p>
<p>Securities and Exchange Commission</p>
<p>Madoff’s name comes up in a probe of Florida accountants who allegedly sold  unregistered securities.</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">1999</span></p>
<p>SEC examiners review trading practices at Madoff’s investment advisory  firm.</p>
<p>2001</p>
<p>The SEC’s Boston office receives information from securities industry  executive Harry Markopolos raising questions about the steady stock market  returns of Madoff’s firm.</p>
<p>2004</p>
<p>The SEC looks into whether Madoff’s firm engaged in improper trading  practices.</p>
<p>2005</p>
<p>The SEC interviews Madoff and members of his family, finding no improper  trading practices.</p>
<p>2005</p>
<p>An industry-based regulatory office finds no improper trading practices by  Madoff’s firm.</p>
<p>2005</p>
<p>SEC investigators meet with Markopolos, who alleges that Madoff’s firm is  “the world’s largest Ponzi scheme.”</p>
<p>2006</p>
<p>An SEC enforcement investigation finds that Madoff and one of his clients  misled regulators. As a result, Madoff agrees to register as an investment  adviser.</p>
<p>2007</p>
<p>The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority examines Madoff’s firm. No  regulatory action results.”</p>
<p>Eight alleged investigations and a $50 billion Ponzi scheme goes undetected?  Who in the hell were the SEC “investigators”? Big Bird and the Cookie Monster  from Sesame Street?</p>
<p>Amazingly enough, Harry Markopolos, while working at a rival firm, wrote in  1999 that Madoff was running a Ponzi scheme. Markopolos now looks like a  certifiable genius, a fact that is of little comfort to those whom Madoff  robbed, or SEC commissioners and employees who are left looking like complete  fools, or worse.</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">The bottom line seems to be that, as of now,  no single explanation makes sense in the bizarre Bernie Madoff crime spree. </span></p>
<p>Allan Sloan, senior editor at CNN Money Fortune (Reference 3) filed this  report, in part:</p>
<p>“<span style="font-weight: bold;">CNN Money Fortune</span></p>
<p>“NEW YORK (Fortune) — Yes, there really are times when life imitates art. A  case in point: the Bernie Madoff scandal, in which the disgraced investor bears  a startling resemblance to Zero Mostel’s sleazy theater promoter in one of my  favorite flicks, “The Producers.”</p>
<p>“What do the real-life Madoff and Mostel’s fictional Max Bialystock have in  common? They used the same principles to pull off a big-time financial fraud.  These are: If you’re going to steal, steal big. If you’re going to cook the  books, make up numbers of your own - don’t try to doctor the real ones. And,  finally, if you’re going to fleece people, turn down enough potential investors  so that those whose money you take feel so honored that they don’t do basic  homework to find out about you.</p>
<p>“No, I’m not making light of what Madoff did, which has ruined the lives of  people who went to sleep feeling rich and woke up poor, and which has devastated  worthy charities. I’m just trying to show you how the world works, and why we  see the same things, year after year, decade after decade, with frauds like  Madoff and the Bayou hedge funds and other less famous sleazoids.</p>
<p>“How could the Securities and Exchange Commission, which admits it had gotten  tips about Madoff for years, bring some penny-ante insider-trading claim against  Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban while failing to see that Madoff was ripping  off billions from the likes of Elie Wiesel’s foundation?</p>
<p>“Not to prejudge the SEC’s investigation of itself, but I’ll bet the answer  will turn out to be that things have always been this way and probably always  will be. If commission enforcers get a bigger budget and are treated with  respect rather than being dissed (including, I’ll bet, by some of Madoff’s  victims) as an obstacle to free markets, things may improve. But don’t expect a  fraud-free era to ensue.</p>
<p>“I’m saying this not out of cynicism but because I know how regulators  generally work. I’ve seen it for years, in fields ranging from department stores  to oil-drilling partnerships. You’re likely to get caught if you run a few  inches outside the baseline, because regulators are set up to catch that. But  run so far out that you’re playing on a whole different ball field? You can get  away with that if you’re enough of a financiopath, and your luck holds.</p>
<p>“Take the mutual fund “market timing” scandal kicked over by Eliot Spitzer  back when he was New York’s respected attorney general rather than its disgraced  “love guv.” As you may recall, many foreign-stock mutual funds - which, like all  mutual funds, are regulated up the wazoo by the SEC - were allowing hedge funds  to do quick trades that ripped off the funds’ long-term investors by diverting  profits from them to the hedgies. (This really should have been called  “skimming,” but that’s another story.)</p>
<p>“Spitzer’s folks got tipped to this game by an informant - but it turned out  there had been plenty of hints, such as hedge funds telling clients about their  “timing” activities. The reason the SEC didn’t find this during its routine  audits was that it wasn’t looking for it. Who’d have thought that funds would be  so stupid as to risk their most valuable asset - their reputation - for the  relative crumbs the hedge funds threw them?</p>
<p>“No one picked up on our fictional friend Max Bialystock because he made up a  fraud from whole cloth - he sold investors 25,000% of a ghastly, tasteless  musical, “Springtime for Hitler,” that was designed to fail and let him keep the  money, but became a huge hit. Like Madoff, Bialystock didn’t have enough money  to pay off investors who wanted their dough.</p>
<p>“Both scamsters also generated an aura of exclusivity by not taking money  from just anyone. “It’s due diligence by crowd, and it doesn’t work,” says Jim  Mintz, whose Mintz Group specializes in background checks.</p>
<p>“There’s a big move on for the SEC to regulate hedge funds. It’s a worthy  idea. But trust me. If a big fund is engaged in a big fraud, the SEC’s unlikely  to find it without an outside tip. Or maybe even with one. That’s how things  worked with Madoff. And how they work in the real world. And how they’ll  probably always work. ”</p>
<p>Which brings up an interesting point about  deposed New York Governor Eliot Spitzer: Was the powerful Democrat spending too  much time and money on ladies of the night at the Emperor’s Club to catch Bernie  Madoff?</p>
<p>A video on Finance Yahoo (Reference 4), provides even more information on the  Bernie Madoff story and is worth viewing.</p>
<p>References:</p>
<p>(1) History of SEC  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._Securities_and_Exchange_Commission</p>
<p>(2)</p>
<p>http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iIXcRJuIjbkGKM5GT0txn4-1CJowD95H7FI80</p>
<p>(3)<br />
http://money.cnn.com/2009/01/05/magazines/fortune/sloan_madoff.fortune/?postversion=2009010506</p>
<p>(4)<br />
http://finance.yahoo.com/tech-ticker/article/152910/SEC-Investigated-(And-Fooled-by)-Madoff-Eight-Times?tickers=^dji,^gspc,dia,spy,qqqq</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bphouse.com/politics/2009/01/05/why-is-bernie-madoff-not-in-jail/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Erectile Function–An INALIENABLE Right!</title>
		<link>http://bphouse.com/politics/2009/01/03/erectile-function%e2%80%93an-inalienable-right/</link>
		<comments>http://bphouse.com/politics/2009/01/03/erectile-function%e2%80%93an-inalienable-right/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 20:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Lillpop</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Erectile Dysfunction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bphouse.com/politics/?p=19</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As men in the “boomer” generation reach the later stages of life, a new medical ailment is driving millions of once virile, confident men to tears and shame.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ARKLgMMazUY/SV_T0-omLvI/AAAAAAAAC1o/ruEe95J82lY/s1600-h/viagra.jpeg"><img style="margin: 0px 10px 10px 0px; float: left; width: 91px; height: 127px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ARKLgMMazUY/SV_T0-omLvI/AAAAAAAAC1o/ruEe95J82lY/s400/viagra.jpeg" border="0" alt="" /></a></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">Satire By John W. Lillpop</span></p>
<p>As men in the “boomer” generation reach the later stages of life, a new  medical ailment is driving millions of once virile, confident men to tears and  shame.</p>
<p>Namely, the dreaded ED, as in Erectile Dysfunction.</p>
<p>ED, pervasive among men in their 50s and 60s, has spawned a new family of  medicines devised to treat the debilitating loss of performance in life’s most  vital game.</p>
<p>The sports analogy is “He got game!”</p>
<p>Men with ED “got no game.”</p>
<p>But thanks to some nerdy scientist, who has probably never witnessed the  awesome beauty of the disrobed female anatomy in person, American men now have  Viagra.</p>
<p>We call it Blue Magic.</p>
<p>In sports vernacular, “We got game again!”</p>
<p>Hallelujah and glory be to the goddess of love!</p>
<p>The only side effect with Viagra is the danger of heart attack from too much  excitement. But what the heck, no drug is perfect. Right?</p>
<p>But, the medicine is a bit pricey.</p>
<p>In order to determine what can be done to make Viagra accessible to all men,  we contracted with beltway insider Opel Bijiquiovarti for a research project.  The objective was to determine what legislative steps should be taken to make  Blue Magic an integral and automatic part of the American Dream.</p>
<p>Bijiquiovarti, a constitutional scholar and part-time assistant pharmacist at  the CIA, released the following findings, but only on the condition of  anonymity:</p>
<p>The Bijiquiovarti findings:</p>
<p>* Erectile Function (EF) is an inalienable right guaranteed by the United  States Constitution.</p>
<p>* The right to EF is found in the same section of the Constitution that  guarantees a woman’s right to an abortion, and is adjacent to the Constitutional  requirement that mandates separation of church and state.</p>
<p>* Because EF is an inalienable right, Viagra must be made available to all  males diagnosed with ED. For men unable to afford the medicine, Bijiquiovarti  has learned that state and local governments must provide Blue Magic free of  charge. No exceptions!</p>
<p>Congratulations to Bijiquiovarti for his outstanding research and reporting  expertise!</p>
<p>Coming as it does so close to Valentine’s Day, the Bijiquiovarti report is  the most exciting news since the Emancipation Proclamation.</p>
<p>Thanks again, Dr. Bijiquiovarti!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bphouse.com/politics/2009/01/03/erectile-function%e2%80%93an-inalienable-right/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Undocumented Boomers Headed to Mexico!</title>
		<link>http://bphouse.com/politics/2009/01/03/undocumented-boomers-headed-to-mexico/</link>
		<comments>http://bphouse.com/politics/2009/01/03/undocumented-boomers-headed-to-mexico/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 20:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Lillpop</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[illegal immigration]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[john lillpop]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[undocumented boomers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bphouse.com/politics/?p=11</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As you are no doubt aware, America the Great is quickly becoming America the Gray. The so-called “boomer” generation, comprised of approximately 40 million Americans, will soon reach retirement age.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><span style="text-decoration: underline;">An Open Letter To Mexican  President Felipe Calderon</span> </em></p>
<p><em></em><br />
Dear President Calderon:<br />
As you are no doubt aware, America  the Great is quickly becoming America the Gray. The so-called “boomer”  generation, comprised of approximately 40 million Americans, will soon reach  retirement age.</p>
<p>As they age, America’s boomers yearn for a less frantic pace—and a lifestyle  that allows one to pause and smell the roses now and again.</p>
<p>In other words, boomers are looking for the “Good Life” which is supposed to  accrue to those who work 45 years, pay ungodly amounts in taxes, raise a family,  put children through college, and baby-sit the grandchildren.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, the United States is no longer as hospitable as it once was to  graying citizens.</p>
<p>As a result, boomers have decided to move en masse to your beloved  Mexico.</p>
<p>Knowing that the Mexican government is a strong proponent of open borders and  liberal immigration policies, as least as regards migrations from Mexico to  America, boomers anticipate that their needs and wishes will be fully  accommodated with minimal interference and bureaucratic hassle.</p>
<p>In plain English, boomers expect to be treated like upscale Mexican citizens,  with all the perks and advantages attendant thereto.</p>
<p>Incidentally, we prefer to be called “undocumented boomers.”</p>
<p>President Calderon, I am delighted to announce that 40 million undocumented  American boomers are headed to Mexico!</p>
<p>Viva America!</p>
<p>Current plans call for about 500,000 boomers to cross the border into Mexico  each month, starting in November of this year.</p>
<p>As with any complex transition, there are several “ground rules” that must be  followed in order to make this change seamless for the boomers.</p>
<p>Accordingly, your attention is directed to the following action items:</p>
<p>* Mexican sovereignty, borders, and immigration laws are essentially null and  void with respect to undocumented boomers. No attempt should be made to enforce  said restrictions on these good hearted, formerly hard working Americans.</p>
<p>* Undocumented boomers shall receive unlimited education, food, housing,  legal assistance, and geriatric care on demand, the cost of which shall be borne  solely by Mexican taxpayers.</p>
<p>* Mexican hospitals, medical clinics, and emergency rooms shall be obligated  to meet the medical needs of all undocumented boomers, without regard to ability  to pay.</p>
<p>This obligation shall not be limited or restricted in any way because of any  real or projected negative impact on Mexico’s medical systems, including the  loss of vital services to Mexican citizens.</p>
<p>* Although undocumented boomers shall not be obligated to pay for medical  services received, they shall be entitled to send $30-50 billion a year back to  the United States with impunity. The Mexican government shall actively  facilitate the transfer of such funds to America.</p>
<p>* English is the only language used by undocumented boomers; boomers have no  desire or obligation to learn Spanish.</p>
<p>* America’s historic free speech, free love, and anti-war revolutions  originated with activists in the boomer generation.</p>
<p>In keeping with the boomer tradition of aggressive activism, from time to  time it may be necessary for millions of boomers to take over the streets of  Mexico’s large cities in order to protest proposed new laws when the “rights” of  undocumented boomers are in jeopardy.</p>
<p>During such protests, boomers will wave Old Glory and scream “Yes, we can!”  and “We are Mexico!” in English, as they protest the rule of law.</p>
<p>All such activities are valid free speech expressions in a thriving  Democracy. As a consequence, the Mexican government shall take no action to  limit or impede protests by undocumented boomers.</p>
<p>* We Americans celebrate the 4th of July to commemorate our independence from  Great Britain. Undocumented boomers prefer to conduct business as normal on May  5 and September 16, and to reserve the 4th of July for fireworks, BBQs, and  displaying Red, White, and Blue everywhere.</p>
<p>* Undocumented boomers shall be licensed to drive without regard to  immigration status. All driver instruction and testing materials shall be in  English.</p>
<p>* Blood relatives of undocumented boomers shall be eligible for the same  reduced tuition rates offered to Mexican students in the nation legally.  Immersion for the purpose of teaching Spanish is a failed concept and shall not  even be attempted.</p>
<p>* Undocumented boomers shall be eligible to vote in Mexican elections without  any requirement to prove identity.</p>
<p>* Grandchildren of undocumented boomers born in Mexico shall be Mexican  citizens by virtue of their birth, regardless of the immigration status of their  parents and grand parents, and</p>
<p>* Undocumented boomers are very sensitive and are easily offended. Therefore,  Mexicans shall refrain from using terms like “illegal alien,” “Red Neck,”  “Cracker,”or “Gringo” when addressing or discussing boomers.</p>
<p>In closing, Mr. President, let me assure you that undocumented boomers look  forward to contributing positively to Mexican society, culture, and financial  stability.</p>
<p>In doing so, we will attempt to do for Mexico what 38 million Mexican illegal  aliens are currently doing to America!</p>
<p>With best regards and wishes for a diverse and free Mexico, I remain  sincerely yours.</p>
<p>John W. Lillpop<br />
San Jose, California</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bphouse.com/politics/2009/01/03/undocumented-boomers-headed-to-mexico/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More Qualified for Elective Office: Governor Palin or Diva Kennedy?</title>
		<link>http://bphouse.com/politics/2009/01/02/more-qualified-for-elective-office-governor-palin-or-diva-kennedy/</link>
		<comments>http://bphouse.com/politics/2009/01/02/more-qualified-for-elective-office-governor-palin-or-diva-kennedy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 20:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Lillpop</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[caroline kennedy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[sarah palin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bphouse.com/politics/?p=7</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kudos to diva Caroline Kennedy for finally crawling out of her protective cocoon of elitist wealth and privilege long enough to perform a vital public service.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Satire By John Lillpop</p>
<p><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ARKLgMMazUY/SV53mWhZtxI/AAAAAAAAC1g/Gpkcv58Yi4g/s1600-h/sarah+betcha"><img style="margin: 0px 10px 10px 0px; float: left; width: 400px; height: 385px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ARKLgMMazUY/SV53mWhZtxI/AAAAAAAAC1g/Gpkcv58Yi4g/s400/sarah+betcha" border="0" alt="" /></a></p>
<p>Kudos to diva Caroline Kennedy for finally crawling out of her protective  cocoon of elitist wealth and privilege long enough to perform a vital public  service.</p>
<p>That public service occurred when Ms. Kennedy exposed herself to scrutiny by  the New York press, which revealed her severely limited vocabulary, shallow  intellect, and which proved, conclusively, that an education from a liberal  eastern school(s) is darn near worthless in the real world.</p>
<p>In the process of being deflowered by folks who should be her allies, the  51-year-old Camelot reject took the place of Alaska Governor Sarah Palin as the  most maligned woman on the global political stage.</p>
<p>From the Associatedcontent.com report, linked in reference (1), this, in  part:</p>
<p>“By the count of the New York Daily News, Caroline Kennedy used the phrase  ‘you know’ two hundred times in an interview with the Daily News, a hundred and  thirty times in an interview with the New York Times, and eighty times in an  interview with TV station New York.”</p>
<p>That totals 410 “you knows,” quite normal for a pimple-faced elementary  school brat in need of a crash course in remedial English before graduating to  high school, but hardly what one would expect from a serious candidate to  replace Secretary of State-designate Hillary Clinton as New York’s junior member  in the United States Senate.</p>
<p>More from Associatedcontent.com:</p>
<p>“Some experts in public speaking suggest that this tendency to use ‘you know’  on the part of Caroline Kennedy is a sign of inexperience. The ‘you know’ tic  can be solved by training and practice.</p>
<p>“The problem for Caroline Kennedy is that this training and practice should  have happened before she suddenly leaped into the deep end of the political  pool. First impression count in national politics and Caroline Kennedy as made a  poor first impression.”</p>
<p>Caroline Kennedy has other problems.</p>
<p>Most significantly, unlike Governor Sarah Palin, who has been elected and  served as a mayor and as Governor of Alaska, Caroline has no political  experience or record of public service.</p>
<p>Being a spoiled, 51-year-old diva with symptoms common to women in mid-life  crisis does not qualify anyone, even a Kennedy, for the United States  Senate.</p>
<p>Then there is the matter of pedigree.</p>
<p>Unlike Governor Palin, Caroline Kennedy has a famous uncle who, in a drunken  rush to commit adultery, drove a car off a bridge, swam to safety himself, but  whom abandoned a 29-year-old female passenger (not his wife), dooming the young  woman to death by drowning.</p>
<p>That would be Teddy Kennedy, who because of his wealth and political  connections, was not prosecuted for manslaughter and served no jail time for his  role in the death of Mary Jo Kopechne.</p>
<p>Finally, and least importantly, unlike Governor Palin who is drop-dead  beautiful, charismatic, and an inspirational ball of energy, Caroline Kennedy  has about the same sex appeal and oomph! as White House correspondent Helen  Thomas.</p>
<p>Not cool!</p>
<p>Is Governor Sarah Palin more qualified to serve as Vice President than  Caroline Kennedy is to be a U.S. Senator?</p>
<p>You betcha!</p>
<p>Reference (1)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/1348235/caroline_kennedy_flubs_you_know_interviews.html">http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/1348235/caroline_kennedy_flubs_you_know_interviews.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bphouse.com/politics/2009/01/02/more-qualified-for-elective-office-governor-palin-or-diva-kennedy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sovereignty Day in Iraq: Worthy of BREAKING NEWS?</title>
		<link>http://bphouse.com/politics/2009/01/01/sovereignty-day-in-iraq-worthy-of-breaking-news/</link>
		<comments>http://bphouse.com/politics/2009/01/01/sovereignty-day-in-iraq-worthy-of-breaking-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 19:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Lillpop</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bphouse.com/politics/?p=3</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[January 1, 2009 is indeed a memorable day in the history of Iraq and for the people of that nation.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="blog_text3">
<div class="post hentry uncustomized-post-template"><a name="6256648119865393638"></a></p>
<div class="post-body entry-content"><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ARKLgMMazUY/SV0RTXZL7gI/AAAAAAAAC1Y/UgLV3Cu3vRI/s1600-h/iraq-vote+purple.jpg"><img style="margin: 0px 10px 10px 0px; float: left; width: 305px; height: 400px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ARKLgMMazUY/SV0RTXZL7gI/AAAAAAAAC1Y/UgLV3Cu3vRI/s400/iraq-vote+purple.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a><span style="font-weight: bold;">By John W. Lillpop</span></p>
<p>January 1, 2009 is indeed a memorable day in the history of Iraq and for the  people of that nation.</p>
<p>So memorable and important, in fact, that Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki  has proposed that each January 1 be officially celebrated as “Sovereignty Day,”  in addition to the traditional New Year’s holiday.</p>
<p>In case you missed it, responsibility for a major portion of Iraq’s security  has been officially handed over to the Iraqi government. That includes Baghdad’s  “Green Zone” as described in the referenced excerpt(1).</p>
<p>Quite predictably, sovereignty day in Iraq did not rise to the level of <span style="font-weight: bold;">BREAKING</span> <span style="font-weight: bold;">NEWS!</span> in the minds of left wing American media,  those “objective” souls obsessed with chronicling every movement, or hint of  movement, by a Marxist President-elect dawdling in the warm sands of Honolulu’s  beaches!</p>
<p>However, the turnover did mean a great deal to Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri  al-Maliki who said:</p>
<p>“It is our right to consider this day the day of sovereignty and the  beginning of the process of retrieving every inch of our nation’s soil,” Nuri  al-Maliki said in a ceremony.</p>
<p>For those who care, Iraq has regained control of it’s own airspace and is  scheduled to hold provisional and national elections in January and December,  respectively.</p>
<p>As reported in the excerpt from reference (2):</p>
<p>“Iraqis have a double opportunity to make their new found voices heard at the  ballot box this year.</p>
<p>“Provincial Elections are due to take place on 31 January. And, according to  the Iraqi Constitution, national elections will need to be held by December 2009  as well.</p>
<p>“After years of living under tyranny, unable to influence or hold to account  the former regime, Iraqis are keen to once more practice their new democratic  rights.</p>
<p>“Local and national elections were last held in 2005.</p>
<p>“The path of democracy and political maturity since 2003 hasn’t always been  smooth. But it is taking shape.”</p>
<p>So, why has the good news from Iraq escaped <span style="font-weight: bold;">BREAKING NEWS </span>status in American media?</p>
<p>For starters, Iraq is breaking news ONLY when young American men and women  are being wasted in record numers, or when the American military is alleged to  have reenacted the Holocaust by nuking innocent Iraqi citizens in place of  starving Jews.</p>
<p>American deaths in Iraq have all but vanished, leaving the New York Times and  other bastions of liberal propaganda completely depressed and disinterested!</p>
<p>Then there is this distressingly inconvenient truth: The “surge” crafted by  General David Patreaus and commander-in-chief George W. Bush actually  WORKED!</p>
<p>By the by, that would be the same surge that our Messiah in Waiting voted  against!</p>
<p>Finally, ANY good news linked to the name George W. Bush is automatically  relegated to page 1,120, or buried somewhere in the obituaries, presented in  size two font, if you please, headline in lower case.</p>
<p>Still, congratulations are in order to the people of Iraq who can now look  forward to the future without worrying about being tortured, maimed, or  slaughtered by the “butcher of Baghdad,” the late, not-so-great Saddam  Hussein.</p>
<p>Only liberal nut balls like attorney Ramsey Clark, the man whose failed legal  defense of Saddam Hussein should make him eligible for a Nobel Peace prize,  believe that the world is not better off, and safer, with the despicable  dictator permanently confined to a six-foot deep hole in Takrit.</p>
<p>Finally, although “Sovereignty Day” does have a nice ring to it, a more  jubilant spirit might be fostered with a more colorful designation.</p>
<p>How about, “Purple People” Day?</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">HAPPY PURPLE PEOPLE DAY!</span></p>
<p>References:</p>
<p>(1)</p>
<p>http://blog.wired.com/defense/2009/01/sovereignty-day.html</p>
<p>(2)</p>
<p>http://www.fco.gov.uk/en/fco-in-action/uk-in-iraq/iraq-case-studies/iraq-elections09/</p></div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bphouse.com/politics/2009/01/01/sovereignty-day-in-iraq-worthy-of-breaking-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
