Update 1 added the top question

Update 2 adds the final sentence

If I was forced by Society to do it, how can Ramsay Scott be prevented by the same Society from being in the position of possibly doing it?

3 years and 9 months for Ramsay Scott     
Written by David Rawcliffe     
Friday, 25 September 2009 06:02 
http://www.adamsmith.org/blog/justice-and-civil-liberties/3-years-and-9-months-for-ramsay-scott-200909254181/
SNIP
Take pity on Ramsay Scott, a 21 year-old man sentenced on Wednesday to 3 years and 9 months in prison for firearms possession. The student, who has been diagnosed as suffering from Asperger’s Syndrome or a schizoid personality disorder, had bought £20,000 worth of gun components on the internet, and amassed a collection including pistols, sub-machine gun parts and ammunition.
There is no evidence whatsoever that Scott had ever harmed anyone else with these weapons, nor that he had any intention of doing so. As Lord Uist remarked to the High Court in Edinburgh on sentencing him:
It is probably impossible to say what, if anything, you would have done with the weapons had the police not intervened.
He explained that Scott’s was guilty not because he had actually hurt someone else, but because:
There must have been at least the possibility that you would have used them to cause injury to others
UNSNIP

“There must have been at least the possibility that you would have used them to cause injury to others. “

On me, thalidomide monster, the Heidelberg quacks forced a hook 40 years ago when I was seven.

Yes, everybody was afraid of me, But still, they forced me.

They didn’t tell that I could have used that hook to cause injury to others.
No they forced me.

And one year later, I had to run against a car

Both femurs broken and 6 weeeks of coma

And after that, they still forced me.

Témoignage thalidomide : Les Monstres de Heidelberg
par Ivo Cerckel
mercredi 2 septembre 2009
http://www.agoravox.fr/tribune-libre/article/temoignage-thalidomide-les-60989

Free Ramsay Scott!

See also the comments (not mine) and all the arguments in the article and in the comments at the Adam Smith Institute link above.

Ivo Cerckel
honestmoney@maktoob.com
http://twitter.com/ivocerckel/

At the end of the day, Merkel will have nothing to regulate.

From The Sunday Times
February 8, 2009
Thalidomide ‘was created by the NAZIS’ (1)

Regulators allowed thalidomide on the market and when the whistle on thalidomide was blown at a Düsseldorf congress of neurologists on 30 April - 01 May 1960, those same regulators have not done anything.
Thalidomide was eventually taken from the market on 27 November 1961, by its maker, Chemie Grünenthal GmbH, and thus not by the regulators who had allowed it in the first place.  (2)

Comprendo?

And then they argue that we need product liability laws, just like in Pittsburg, the G20 is now conspiring to destroy everything.

The crisis is due to unbacked at least irredeemable paper money and fractional-reserve banking. (3)

But German chancellor Angela Merkel, who’s coming up for re-election or not this week-end in Germany, is arguing that market regulation is more important than the rebalancing of the economy. (4)

That’s what our Masters, who let thalidomide on the market for 18 months after the Düsseldorf 30 April – 01 May 1960 warning, also said after thalidomide: “we, bureaucrats, need more regulation”.

At the end of the day, Merkel will have nothing to regulate.

From The Sunday Times
February 8, 2009
Thalidomide ‘was created by the Nazis’ (1)

For your consideration …

Ivo Cerckel
honestmoney@maktoob.com
http://twitter.com/ivocerckel/

NOTES

(1)
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/health/article5683577.ece

(2)
http://bphouse.com/honest_money/human-testing/
[If the link does not work, try to copy it and paste it in your browser]

(3)
http://bphouse.com/honest_money/worthless-digital-liquidity-and-fractional-reserve-banking-are-fraudulent-%e2%80%93-let-the-system-collapse-now/